Bring on the Speeches: McMullen’s Musings’ Second Annual Selection Sunday Awards

Posted: March 14, 2011 in Uncategorized

Nolan Smith and Duke are a #1 seed, but do they win any awards?

The 68 teams have been selected for the NCAA men’s basketball tournament, and the analysts have already begun questioning the sanity of the Selection Committee. From now until the first jump ball is thrown, the sports world will be hovering over brackets and overanalyzing them until they’re sick of looking at them. But before we start looking towards Houston and the Final Four, we take a look at the best and worst of the selections. That’s right, it’s time for the Second Annual Selection Sunday Awards! Let’s not delay any longer and hand out the first award…

The Miracle on Hardwood Award: This award goes to the 16 seed who has the best chance of, for the first time in the history of the tournament, defeating a top seed in the tournament. Just like the 1980 USA hockey team, this team will make you believe in miracles.

The award goes to: Boston University (vs. Kansas).

Unfortunately, this award goes to the Terriers by default. To be perfectly honest, I don’t think any other team has the capabilities to knock off any of the top seeds, and even Boston University doesn’t look good to knock off the Jayhawks.  In their two games against ranked opponents (#6 Villanova and #10 Kentucky) this year, they lost by 16 and 34, respectively. They barely made the tournament as it was, needing a nail-biting America East Championship game against Stony Brook to even get there. If they pull off the most miraculous victory in sports history, it will go down as the biggest upset or the biggest collapse in the history of the tournament.

The Dentist’s Chair Award: This award goes to the top seed who has the toughest road to Houston, assuming all games are played “chalk,” meaning all the higher seeds win their games. Getting to the Final Four for this team will be like a trip to the dentist: long and painful.

This award goes to: Ohio State.

The overall number-one seed has a tough road to Houston, and that’s to be expected. Obviously, they’re all but assured to win their first round matchup, but then, if it goes chalk, they’ll have to play George Mason, who are always a threat to pull off a big upset. Then, they’d be up against a pretty powerful Kentucky team, followed by a North Carolina team who can surprise some people in the Elite Eight. The top-ranked Buckeyes are a pretty powerful team, but all the batterings they will take will probably torpedo their chances to get to the Final Four.

The Concorde Award: This award goes to the top-seeded team who has the easiest road to the Final Four. Like the supersonic jet of the same name,  the road to Houston will be smooth sailing for this team. They won’t face many challenges on their road to the national championship, and possibly could not be challenged until they get to the Final Four.

This award goes to: Duke.

It’s not going to be as easy as all that for the Blue Devils. However,  it does seem like if it all plays chalk, the only concievable challenge for the Blue Devils would be second-seeded San Diego State, and that wouldn’t be until the Elite Eight. Duke, if the bracket goes chalk, would play Michigan in the second round, followed by number-four seed Texas, who might pose a slight problem, but not much of one. The Blue Devils should have a pretty easy run to Houston, if they don’t get too complacent with their smooth road.

Messin’ With Sasquatch Award (formerly House of Cards Award): This award goes to the high seeded team that’s setting themselves up for a big fall. Just like the humans in the Jack Link’s commercials, they may feel comfortable with their high seed, but one false move and they could wind up getting punted like a football.

This award goes to: #2 Florida.

Yes, the Gators did make the SEC finals, losing to a very tough Kentucky team. However, I don’t really think they’re a very strong #2 seed. They got blown away by the Wildcats, and have had very tough times with ranked teams in general this year (going 4-2, but had to earn those victories). They also lost some games that they should have won (such as a fairly bad loss to Jacksonville), and that really doesn’t look good on a number-two seed’s resume. They’ll make it past the first round, but past that, it does look a little spotty, and they should be primed to defend against the upset.

One Shining Moment Award: This award, named after the song that officially ends the tournament, goes to the first round game that embodies the true meaning of that song. This is the one shining moment of the tournament, where there could be an exciting finish, there could be a nail-biting few moments…but all in all, one of the greatest, if not the greatest, matchup of the first round.

This award goes to: Richmond/Vanderbilt.

I like this game for this award because, while Vanderbilt did fall short of the SEC title (losing in the semi-finals), they are a very tough team. They have gone only .500 (four out of eight) against ranked teams, but they have played tough, losing to those teams by no more than ten points. When the lights are on bright, I do think the Commodores will step up and put on a show for the fans.

Richmond, the Atlantic-10 champions, are extremely tough as well. Against ranked teams, they have beaten some pretty big competition (beating Purdue, who got seeded third, and splitting two games with Temple, who also were seeded higher). They have proven that they can run with the big boys, and Vanderbilt has too. When these two get together  in Denver, sparks are sure to fly, and you can be sure you’re going to see one exciting game.

George Mason Award: This award goes to a team that might fly under the radar of most bracketologists, and, like the Patriots of recent history, make a surprising run towards the Final Four. This team has the potential to pull off some really huge upsets in the tournament.

This award goes to: Old Dominion.

Right off the bat, they have to face last year’s National runner-up, Butler. That has the potential to be a huge game in and of itself. Right after that, if they make it, they’ll face top-seeded Pittsburgh. While they have lost both of their games against ranked opponents (Georgetown and Missouri), they played both teams very tough, losing by only two and three, respectively. All the teams in the Southeastern bracket should be on the lookout for the Monarchs, because they will be one team that might fly under the radar.

Snake in the Grass Award: Most of my readers might remember this from when I predicted every single game in the tournament in the blog’s infancy. This award goes to the team that, for all intents and purposes, should not be in the tournament, but has wormed its way into the tournament somehow (by sheer luck, most likely).

This award goes to: USC.

What was the selection committee thinking? To even put them into the tournament flies in the face of parity. First off, they are only five games above .500 (19-14). Second, they have two, count them, two, quality wins (against Texas and Tennessee, both in December). The rest is just a mess. Third, there were about five other teams much more deserving than USC (Virginia Tech or Alabama, anyone?), and to deny them and put the Trojans in is just a big, big mistake on the Committee’s part. Expect a one-and-done from them, because they don’t deserve to be here…not at all.

Biggest Snub: This award goes to the team that should have made the tournament, but were passed over for some reason or another (not enough quality wins, bad RPI, the Committee had a brain fart…take your pick). This team certainly was good enough to make the postseason, but fell just short, but could certainly be a contender in any bracket.

This award goes to: Alabama.

The Crimson Tide beat Georgia (a team that finished fourth in the SEC East and is seeded tenth in the tournament) twice (once in the regular season finale and once in the SEC tournament), but yet, that apparently wasnt good enough for the committee. Not a single SEC West team made the tournament, and Alabama finished with an identical overall record to the Bulldogs (and a better conference record, 12-4 to Georgia’s 9-7). It’s a travesty that the Crimson Tide didn’t get in, while USC did (see above). I think the committee will immediately regret this decision (apologies to Anchorman) and be kicking themselves as Alabama (hopefully) dominates in the NIT.

Worst Seeding: This award goes to the seeding decision that will draw the most ire of all of them. This is the seeding that will have bracketologists scratching their heads and analysts screaming for the committee’s ouster.

This award goes to: USC even being seeded in this tournament.

For all the reasons above, and concievably even more, this was the absolute worst decision the committee has ever made, bar none. The Trojans have absolutely no business being in this tournament, and the worst part of it is that they shoved out some other, more deserving, team to be there. Its totally unfair to the teams that had to work really hard to stay afloat, to have USC just sneak in and take it all away.

Best Seeding: This goes to the best seeding decision by the committee; one they should be sincerely proud of. This is a seed that is well-deserved, and one that the analysts should be able to accept without much of a problem.

This award goes to: #2 Notre Dame.

To be perfectly honest, I never really saw Notre Dame as a top seed, and never really thought they would drop as low as a three seed. They’ve been pretty consistent, losing to only teams that are worthy to beat them (losing to only teams that are in the tournament) and winning the ones they should win easily. They weren’t really on par with the top seeds, but I honestly think they’ll make a big run without the 1 in front of their names. If they don’t at least make a decent run at the National Championship, you’ll know they went down swinging.

And now, for my national championship pick:

North Carolina over Notre Dame, 91-88 in overtime.

I honestly think at least one #1 seed will make it to the Final Four, and I think that will be Duke. However, when they get to Houston, they will face off against a Carolina team who is detemined to avenge their loss in the ACC championship game. We’ve already discussed Notre Dame in depth, but their consistent play will make them a force to be reckoned with in the Southwest. If Harrison Barnes and the rest of the young Tar Heels just play their game like they’ve played all season, they will be hard to beat in the Championship game.

So there you have it: all the awards have been handed out, the speeches have been made…now all that’s left to do is to throw the ball up in the air for the opening tip. Enjoy the tournament!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s